Energy Permanent Monitoring Panel of the
World Federation of Scientists
.

INDEX of all files on this site
This informal website is primarily for information and discussion between the present members of the Energy PMP .
To post something on this site, send it to the present webmaster at wilson5@fas .harvard.edu. who hopes that in due course a more direct method will be possible. I would prefer it in html, or in pdf formats, but any format such as msword and  power point presentation will be acceptable
pro tem.   You will be able to download them but not open them on line.

THE MOST RECENT REPORT IS FIRST;  earlier reports are at the end.   BUT  for a given meeting the reports are in order


Plans for International Seminars on Planetary Emergencies
Erice, 18-26 August 2008
Overall Programme of Events

Welcome Dinner – Monday 18 August – 20.30
Permanent Monitoring Panel Meetings – Tuesday 19 August – 09.30-19.00
  Energy -
Pollution  Limits of Development   joint discussions  Paul A.M. Dirac Lecture Hall - Patrick M.S. Blackett Institute
 
Information Security – Richard P. Feynman Lecture Hall – Isidore I. Rabi Institute
Medicine; Climate; Mother & Child; Statistics – Vaulted Rooms – Eugene P. Wigner Institute

Wednesday 20 August – Friday 22 August – 09.30-19.00
Energy - Nuclear Power, Present and Future;
Introduction
Dr Richard Wilson

Harvard University, USA


Nuclear Renaissance: anno 2008
Dr Frantisek Janouch
Sweden and Czech Republic


Nuclear Power, Present and Future
Dr David J. Hill
Argonne National Laboratory, USA


Nuclear Renaissance: Industrial Requirements for an integrated and sustainable solution.
Dr Phillippe Gardaret
AREVA, France


Energy & Pollution - Resolving the Nuclear Waste Issue on the Road to Sustainability;

Summary
Frank. L. Parker


Is nuclear waste the Achilles’ heel of the “nuclear renaissance”?
John F. Ahearne 
          

Large Radiation Accidents-Environmental and Medical Impoacts

R.M. Alexakhin

Russian Institute of Agricultural Radiology and Agroecology, Obninsk, Russia

20 years of Progress in Processing Nuclear Waste
James A Rispoli
Office of Environmental Management US Department of Energy


Climategy & Methodology -  Basic Theoretical Problems;

Food & Energy - Sustainability of Biofuels;

Session Introduction: Current Biofuel Policies and Projected World-Wide Biofuels Growth
Dr. Carmen Difiglio
U.S. Department of Energy, USA

Habitat and Biodiversity Losses from Biofuels
Professor G. David Tilman
University of Minnesota, USA

Biofuel Policies and the Food Crisis in Developing Countries

Dr. Kwadwo Asenso-Okyere
International Food Policy Research Institute, Ethiopia

Global Policy Options for Sustainable Biofuels
Professor Wally Tyner
Purdue University, USA


Climate & Pollution - Airborne Particulates and Health Consequences;

Medicine & Climate - Global Warming and Vector-borne Diseases;


Information Security – The Crisis in Internet Security. Internet security website

    Homeland  Defense vs.  Homeland Security - the big gap paper  power point

    Jody Westby Esq.,    Cyber Risk Inc.  USA


      New Challenges for IT-Security Research in ICT and Electronic Identity Cards and Citizens’ Portals 
    Dr Ugo Helmbrecht
    Federal Office for Information Security, Bonn, Germany


Gian Carlo Wick Gold Medal Award

World Federation of Scientists General Meeting - Paul A.M. Dirac Lecture Hall
Saturday 23 August – 09.30-13.00
PMP and Working Groups Reports – General Debate and Conclusions
Fulkerson, University of Tennessee  EnergyPMP report
 
Sunday 24 August – 09.30-19.00 - Paul A.M. Dirac Lecture Hall - Patrick M.S. Blackett Institute
ICSC – World Laboratory Annual Meetings –Associated Workshops –

June 7th 2006
Richard Wilson as he leaves for an international risk analysis meeting
is increasingly upset with recent international decisions
They are indeed indications of Planetary emergencies
Please excuse him for "sounding off"


SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION IS IGNORED IN CRUCIAL  DECISIONS

HERE ARE FOUR WITH INTERNATIONAL RAMIFICATIONS

IRAQ WMDs - EITHER LIES OR STUPIDITY.     Take your choice
Iraq had no nuclear weapons and few other WMDs.
Experts knew this.  Either the President deliberately misled the American people or he stupidly ignored people who knew.

MISSILES NO DEFENSE
For 40 years it has been known that antiballistic missiles are hard to make work and easy and cheap to render useless. 
 Yet the US is planning to i nstall them in eastern Europe.


CORN BASED ETHANOL DOES NOT STOP GLOBAL WARMING
It has been known for 30 years that it takes almost as much carbon fuel to produce corn as in the oil the ethanol saves. 
It upsets the global food economy.  
Subsidies are counter productive.  

yet on Thursday June 5th 2008 the Farm Folly bill was passed by the US Senate
which perpetuated subidies for: (a) corn based ethanol

(b) food oil for diesel fuel

(c)  and cotton


CARBON
as it comes out of the ground is easy to monitor. 
Yet politicians want to control emissions sector by sector with huge expense and inefficiency.  
The Lieberman-Warner Bill is loaded with pork and may not pass.
But regulating carbon as it comes out leaves less room for pork.   Politicians and financiers dont like it

There are many others of lesser importance.


Wednesday June 4th 2008

Here are two important papers about nuclear matters

Garwin's invited lecture in Rome in May 2008
IAEA report on the future of the Agency


Monday March 17th 2008

3 years ago we tried to get Tom Shea to talk at Erice but he had to  back out at the last moment.   He now has a new job as Director of Global Nuclear Policy Forum in London and has a screed he would like us to consider.

Saturday March 15th 2008

The reports on the Potential for Low Carbon emissions by Professor Julia King (King Review) on low -carbon cars has now been released by the UK government
Part I  , the potential for CO2 reduction
 Part II.  Recommendations for Action
 I note in particular:

"In the long term, carbon-free road transport fuel is the only way to achieve an 80-90 per cent reduction in emissions, essentially decarbonisation. Given biofuels supply constraints, this will require a form of electric vehicle, with novel batteries, charged by  "zero- carbon " electricity oror possibly hydrogen produced by zero- carbon electricity"

This makes our recommendation for treating all non-carbon sources the same particularly relevant.


In view of the fact that the summer 2007 meeting, and the December 2007 meetings specifically discussed the IPCC report, I note the report of the Heartland Institute of February 2008 which disagrees with the conclusions.   I suggest that all members of the relevant panels ead and be able to criticize that report when needed.


Friday March 15th 2008

The article on nuclear power that I was requested to write, and first presented at Erice 4 years ago has only now been published.  It can be downloaded here in pdf format


Thursday December 20th 2007


PREMIO ETTORE MAJORANA - ERICE - SCIENZA PER LA PACE’ 2006  PROGRAMME
Pontifical Academy of Sciences,   The Vatican, 20 December 2007

MORNING SESSION –– AWARD CEREMONY

H.E. Mons. Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo    Greetings and Messages                    10.30-10.45
Professor Antonino Zichichi    The Science for Peace Prize                                  10.45-11.15
Professor Antonino Zichichi    Awards and Motivations                                        11.15-11.30
Laureates Acceptance Speeches                                                                            11.30-12.15
Various Interventions                                                                                              12.15-13.00

AFTERNOON SESSION –– SCIENTIFIC SESSION ON THE WFS PLANETARY EMERGENCIES
    Energy & Climate: Managing Climate Change and the Recommendations of the World Federation of Scientists
Professor William Fulkerson ,   University of Tennessee, USA
 Framework for Managing Climate Change and WFS Recommendations Erice, 2007 slides   Text         15.00-15.20

Professor Myles Allen, University of Oxford, UK    Anthropogenic Climate Change                                15.20-15.40

Dr. Bruce Stram,  Element Markets, USA  The Costs of Doing Nothing                                                     15.40-16.00
                                                  
Professor Nebojsa Nakicenovic IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria   
                The Costs of Mitigation and the Value of Advanced Energy Technologies                                 16.00-16.20

Dr. Carmen Difiglio, US Department of Energy  
            
Challenge of GHG Emission Reductions - The IEA 450 Scenario                                                   16.20-16.40
 
Professor Geraldo Gomes Serra,  University of Sao Paolo, Brazil    
 
Practical Examples to Climate Change Adaptation                                                                                      16.40-17.00

Dr. Tom Wigley,    National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, USA
                    Geo-Engineering as a Safety Valve                                                                                              17.00-17.20


Dr. Michael MacCracken,  Climate Institute, Washington, D.C., USA   
                An R&D Program on Geo-engineering                                                                                            17.20-17.40

GENERAL DISCUSSION                                                                                                                               17.40 -18.30
Professor Antonino Zichichi    Closing Remarks                                                                                             18.30 -18.45


Sunday August 19th 2007


Energy Permanent Monitoring Panel;  Seminar on Planetary Emergencies; joint meeting with climate PMP.

  1. Future of Oil Supply: Dr. Adnan Shihab-Eldin,   Consultant, Vienna
  2. A summary and explanation of the Stern Review: Dr. Bruce Stram not presented
  3. Geopolitics of Energy: Dr. James Conca not presented
  4. ITER update:  Jef Ongena
  5. Broader Approach to ITER: Prof Akira Miyahara
  6. Presentation regarding Carbon Sequestration: Hiskam Khatib (Tentative: Summary of recent Clean Fossil Fuel Studies Committee (CFFS) of the World Energy Council work or other arrangements  Also for information a paper on Managing global emissions.
  7. Focus GHG Policy on Carbon Klaus Lackner and Richard Wilson presented by Richard Wilson;  Power point also  earlier  report  by  Lackner and  Wilson
  8. Other PMP member reports and discussion
  9. Administrative matters
  10. Carmen DeFiglio recoommends as a background the IEA world energy outlook 2001

Monday August 20th 2007  38th session of the Erice International Seminar on Planetary Emergencies  ;


        Plenary Seminar (9.30-12.00)

 

        0.  Welcomes by:  Franco Marini,   President of the Italian Senate,  Welcome message sent by cable
             Dr Ignazio Sanges President National Association of Arts and Sciences
        1.  Professor Antonino Zichichi
          Introduction to the  38th session of the Erice International Seminar
        ENERGY & CLIMATE :   FOCUS: MANAGING CLIMATE CHANGE

        2.   H.E. Professor Jan Szycko, Minister of the Environment, Warsaw, Poland
            Combating Climate Change: Land Use and Biodiversity - Poland's Point of View
        3.  Professor Yuri A. Izrael, Institute of Climate Change and Ecology, Moscow, Russia
           The role of Stratospheric Aerosols in Antagonizing the Global Climate Change
       4.     Professor Mikhail Antonowsky  Carbon Dioxide Dicision, Institute of Global Climate and Ecology, Moscow

            Trends of carbon dioxide concentration since the industriual era and effect on global climate change
       5.    Professor Antonino Zichichi,
             Meteorology and Climate Change:  Problems and Expectations


12.30 – 13.00   SESSION N° 2
*     Professor William A. Sprigg,   Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA
Introduction – Climatological Considerations
*     Professor Arthur H. Rosenfeld,   California Energy Commission, USA
Introduction – Energy Considerations

General reference to IPCC http://www.ipcc.ch

              IPCC files may be downloaded here IPCC files here


13.00  -1400  SESSION No 3
   Chairman A. Zichichi – Co-chair Professor Willaim Sprigg
*     Dr. Filippo Giorgi,  The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy, Physics of Weather and Climate,
        
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report – Summary and Key Messages
*     Dr. Tim Lenton,   School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, UK
         Tipping Points or Gradual Climate Change

FOCUS: MANAGING CLIMATE CHANGE – MITIGATION OF GREENHOUSE GASES
Chairman A. Zichichi – Co-chair A. Rosenfeld
16.00 – 19.00   SESSION N° 4
   *     Dr. Peter Bosch,   Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
            IPCC Fourth Assessment Report – Summary and Key Messages
*     Dr. Igor Bashmakov, Center for Energy Efficiency, Moscow, Russia
            The Three Laws of Energy Energy Transitions
*     Professor Arthur H. Rosenfeld,   California Energy Commission, USA
            Opportunities in the Building Sector
*     Dr Carmen Difiglio,   U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, USA
            Reducing the Growth of Motor Vehicle CO2 Emissions through 2050: Efficiency, Low-Emission Fuels and Advanced Technologies
           
Fuel Efficient Transportation in Wyoming             
*     Professor Andrea Contin, Department of Physics, University of Bologna, Italy   
            Biomass Energy from the Po River Basin and Carbon Sequestration

19.00  Presentation of the "Gian Carlo Wick Gold Medal 2007"  to Professor Andre Martin

Tuesday August 21 2007
 Plenary Seminar (9.30-19.00)

FOCUS: MANAGING CLIMATE CHANGE – FILLING THE GAP: GEO-ENGINEERING AND ADAPTATION
Chairman Tsung-Dao Lee – Co-chair A. Rosenfeld
09.30 – 11.15  SESSIONS N° 5 and 6  
*     Dr. Michael MacCrackenClimate Change Programs, Climate Institute, Washington D.C.; USA

        Geo Engineering: a Possible Insurance Policy

*     Dr. Ken Caldeira,  Global Ecology Dept., the Carnegie Institute of Washington, Stanford, USA
        Geoengineering the Arctic
*     Professor William Fulkerson,  Joint Institute for Energy and Environment, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA
        The Role of Adaptation in Dealing with Climate Change
            Discussion

*     Professor Richard Garwin, Summary and review


12.00 - 13.00

SESSION N° 7
*     Professor Richard Wilson, Harvard University
        The Bush-Putin Disagreement: Some background on Anti-Ballistic Missile Systems  ppt file rtf file

*     Professor Richard Garwin,   IBM Watson Institute
        Ballistic Missile defense deployment to Poland and the Czech Republic
 

FOCUS: MANAGING CLIMATE CHANGE - DEBATE        
Chairman Tsung-Dao Lee – Co-chair A. Rosenfeld
16.00 – 19.00  SESSION N° 8
*     Professor  Christopher Essex, University of Western Ontario

        Introductory Remarks

*     Professor Graeme Stephens,    Colorado State University
          Model Limitations
*     Professor Garth Partridge,    University of Tasmania
          Scientific Questions behind the Arguments concerning the Robustness of Climate Models
*     Professor Anastasios
          A New Theory on the Relation between ENSO and Global Temperature


Wednesday August 22nd 2007
Plenary session on other subjects not recorded here


SESSION No 9

*       Professor Frank Leon Parker, Vanderbilt University
            Understanding Energy Production Externalities        

*       Dr James Conca, New Mexico State University,  Presented by Professor Paolo Ricci

          Energy and Radioactive Waste Disposal in the Age of Recycling

Useful report relevant to the discussions are added here
*       IUGG report of July 2007
          Mike MacCracken's comments to Rep Dingell
          Mike MacCracken's comments on permits

            IPCC (2007) files here

Thursday August 23th 2007; Plenary Session, PMP Reports (9.30- 13.00)
*      Three proposed Resolutions.  Proposed here but modified on Friday

          Carbon Control
          Urgent Study of Uranium resources and costs
          Adding Geoengineering

Friday August 24th 2007 ;
Energy-Climatology Joint PMP Meeting (9.30-13.00)

An open discussion on “Managing Climate Change”
Discussion moderators: Bill Sprigg and William Fulkerson
Partcipants
The three resolutions proposed on August 23rd (links above) were discussed, modified and approved.   (reworded and approved by particpants by e mail later)
Bruce Stram discussed a summary of the Stern Review in the context of “tipping points.”


OTHER ITEMS

Photographs of some energy and climate participants in August 2007
Energy PMP & Guest Bios E-Z.pdf
Energy PMP & Guest Bios A-D.pdf

June 11th 2007

I note that the BP statistical review is now available.  It may be located here.   I believe it is the most reliable of all the factual reviews.

February  1st 2007

I commend the following website for energy news in case you have not seen it. http://www.321energy.com/
Dan Kammen has an OPED in the LA Times leaving the decision up to you.

Klaus Lackner and Dick Wilson have drafted one on a Carbon Permit system

It has been proposed that this subject be discussed at the next PMPT meeting

February  1st 2007

Biofuels are in the news!

Dick Wilson discussed the problem very briefly at the December 21st meeting
Mike McElroy of Harvard has an article in Harvard Today discussing that ethanol from corn makes no sense but ethanol from cellulose (if possible) does  M. McElroy, The "Ethanol Illusion,"  Harvard Magazine November 2006 page 33.  See also http://www-as.harvard.edu/people/faculty/mbm mke sens


NY Times January 31st have a lead article about Palm oil - as grown in Indonesia - as an eco-nightmare"  Elizabeth Rosenthal argues that each case of biofuels must be looked at carefully.

BP is setting up a $500 million biofuels institute and  UCBerkeley/LBL + U of Illinois have apparently won the competition.  Hopefully THEY will look carefully
Daniel Kammen wrote part of the proposal:http://rael.berkeley.edu/ebamm is the basis for the assessment effort

December 21st 2006

Special  Session in the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Vatican city

Presentation of 2005 Erice Prize to Lord John Alderdice, Professor Andre Peterman and  Richard Wilson

Talk on Energy Crisis or Environment Crisis by Richard Wilson
Talk on Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons by Richard Garwin

AUGUST 2006 MEETING

Permanent Monitoring Panel MeetingsSaturday 19 August – 09.30-19.00

International Seminar on Planetary Emergencies 2 sessions on Global Nuclear Power Future: 20th August 2006



Monday 21st August -09.30 - 13.00

World Federation of Scientists General Meeting - Paul A.M. Dirac Lecture Hall

Wednesday 23 August – 09.30-13.00

June 15th 2006

The International energy Agency (IEA) is preparing a 2006 report on  ENERGY TECHNOLOGY PERSPECTIVES.  When it is ready, and IF it is on the web, it may well influence our deliberations.

February 20th 2006

Hisham Khatib's comment on President Bush's energy plans

August 24th 2005

Meeting of PMP under new Chairman:  Professor Klaus Lackner.
Minutes
Draft recommendation for discussion

August 23rd 2005

Report of Energy PMP
Richard Wilson's comment on non proliferation put here for convenience  (Garwin's also)

Erice  schedule:

August 19th  PMP meeting
    3.30 pm -5.30 pm  Discussion of :
Energy Research and Development Priorities:  and funding pressures
Chaired by Bruce Stram:
Commentators:
Richard Wilson
Klaus Lackner
Bruce Stram
    Background material:
            Brief Agenda
            Brief Explanation
            wfsfunding.rtf
            Paper by Marty Hoffman

        2 papers by Dan Kammen,  (1)  (2) 

5.30 pm brief break.

6.pm to 7.30 pm. 
Chaired by Richard Wilson
Comment by Bill Fulkerson (slides here)

August 20/21/22/23   Seminar on Planetary Emergencies. 

First session, August 20th

9.30  -  13.00
How much can renewables contribute?    Bob Schrock Lawrence Livermore Labs  talk  Power point1 power point2
Nuclear Power in Europe               Adolf Birkhofer, University of Munich, Germany abstract
Nuclear Power in Asia
    Akira Miyahara,  Japan
Nuclear Waste Disposal                    Robert Budnitz, Lawrence Livermore Labs Abstract
The American Physical Society Study on Proliferation Problems         Robert Budnitz, Lawrence Liverore Labs
paper
The Next Generation of Nuclear Plants   David Wade, Argonne National Laboratory    Talk
ITER and the future of nuclear Fusion, Jeff Ongena Talk

August 24th,      Joint meeting with World Energy Council's Cleaner Fossil Fuel Systems Subcommittee (participants)

Carbon Capture and Storage – A Way Forward for Cleaner Fossil Fuels
  
10.00        Opening Remarks and a Welcome
                Richard Wilson, Department of Physics, Harvard University, USA
                and Chairman of the World Federation of Scientists Energy PMP
10.05        Introduction and Overview
                Barbara N. McKee, Chairman, Cleaner Fossil Fuels Systems Committee (CFFS), World Energy Council (WEC) and Director, Office of Clean Energy Collaboration, U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE)

Session I – Carbon Capture and Storage Divisions – The basics:
                 Chair: Adnan Shihab-Eldin, Acting Secretary General, OPEC,, member of Energy PMP World Federation of Sciences
10.15      The Need 
   Hisham Khatib, Honorary Vice Chairman, World Energy Council (WEC), Jordan and Member of Energy PMP World Federation of Sciences Khatib's paper part 1 part 2 part 3
10.25         The Technologies
       James Ekmann, Associate Director, National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), USDOE
10.40      The Economics
        Jacek Podkanski, Senior Energy Technology Specialist, Energy Technology Collaboration Division, International Energy Agency (IEA)

Roundtable – Issues and Opportunities

11.00     Environmental Issues :    David Hawkins, Director, Climate Center, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)   slides   Hawkins and Williams paper
11.15    Funding Needs and Opportunity   Elena Nekhaev, Director of Programmes, World Energy Council (WEC), UK
11.30     Industry Perspective    Arthur Lee, Advisor, Global Policy and Strategy, Chevron Corporation, USA
11.45    
Deployment – Fernando Zancan, Executive Manager, SIECESC, Brazil
12.00      Regulatory & Legal Issues   Steve Tantala, Manager, Resources Environment and Carbon Capture and Storage Policy,
Department of Industry,Tourism and Resources, Australia
12.15      Discussion/Dialogue
Chair: Robert Gentile, Managing Partner, Atlantic Partners, USA
13.00         Lunch at Nuovo Edelweiss

Session II – Carbon Capture & Storage – The Visions
Session Chair: Sergio Garribba, Director General, Ministry of Productive Activities, Italy
14.30   New & Innovative Approaches for CO2 Capture & Storage
             Klaus Lackner, Professor of Geophysics and Environmental Environmental Engineering, Columbia University, USA
            and member energy PMP World Federation of Sciences
           
Suzanne Hurter, Leader Exploratory Research, Shell International
            Olav Kaarstad, Carbon Dioxide Management, Statoil, Norway
            David Sevier, Managing Director, Aqueous Logic, United Kingdom
15.45  Break
16.00    Discussion /Dialogue
Chair: Robert Gentile, Managing Partner, Atlantic Partners, USA
17:00    Wrap Up
Barbara N. McKee, Chairman, Cleaner Fossil Fuels Systems Committee (CFFS), World Energy Council (WEC) and Director, Office of Clean Energy Collaboration, U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE)
17.15 Adjournment and Reception

Resorce Discussants
Economics – Michel Lokolo, Deputy Director of Petroleum Products, Ministry of Mines, Water and Energy, Cameroon
Environmental Issues – Gloria Pina, Regional Coordinator, Latin America & Caribbean, WEC
Funding Needs and Opportunity – Jeffrey Price, Managing Partner, Bluewave Resources, USA
Need – Klaus Brendow, Senior Adviser, World Energy Council, Switzerland
Technologies – Jan Davis, Energy Chief Technologist, Rio Tinto, Australia

July 7th 2005

The founder of Greenpeace testified in US congress (on April 2th 2005) supporting nuclear energy

July 6th 2005

An Australian view of Nuclear Power

June 14th

Joseph Chahoud reminds us of the following thoughts of his written in 1999 that make the same arguments we have been repeating recently.

World Energy in the Next Century:  On the Relevance of Electricity in the World’s Energy System

Joseph Chahoud

Several uncertainties and constraints limit our capacity to provide a precise projection of the overall world’s energy system through the next century. The major dimension of these uncertainties is related to the link between the energy demand evolution and the growth of the GDP over time. The strength of this link varies among regions: in industrialized countries this link is relatively weak, that is the energy demand growth trails the economic growth (for every percent increase in economic growth, energy demand increases only about a half percent), while in emerging economies the energy demand and the economic growth are more closely linked (energy demand growth tracks the rate of economic growth).   However, we can reasonably allocate a figure of 640 quadrillions Btu as the total world’s energy consumption by the year 2020. this estimate stays in between the 780 quads Btu which results from an assumption of high speeded economic growth, and the 520 quads Btu which results from an assumption of slow economic growth. Of these 640 quads Btu the industrialized countries, while accounting for not more than 18 percent of the world’s population, are projected to contribute by more than 42 percent and the rest of the world by less than 58 percent.
The standard of living of individuals is one more factor that influences strongly the link between energy demand and economic growth. The advanced economies with high living standards tend to have relatively high energy consumption per capita per year (240 millions Btu as compared to the world average that amounts to 65 millions Btu), but they also tend to have almost stable energy use per capita. As a result we may say that in the advanced economies the energy demand tends to track the population growth.
In developing countries, the standards of living are, instead, relatively lower; so many energy consuming appliances and devices are being widely adopted for the first time (mainly electricity consuming appliances and petroleum products consuming devices). This situation causes energy demand to track more closely the rising income levels. To this respect it is worthwhile to mention that the “per capita income” in the developing countries is expected to increase by a factor of 2,5 by the year 2020, rising from the 1.100 USD to 2.700 USD.Nevertheless, the developing countries will still – on a per capita basis – consume less than one fifth of the energy consumption of the industrialized countries. As for what concerns Africa and the Middle East Region – accounting for one sixth of the world’s population – the per capita energy use is not expected to grow at all over the next 20 years. This is because a near doubling of their population will offset the total growth in energy consumption.  These rising levels of individual income would certainly mean that more areas of the world are gaining access to electricity.  So, it appears quite reasonable to discuss the Electricity Generation and consumption, all over the world, also in relation to the primary energy sources dedicated to its generation, with particular reference to fossil fuels sources.   Now, and for a better understanding of the electricity argument to follow, it might be useful to report beforehand, using a single measure unit (namely the Btu) the world’s total and proven fossil fuels reserves:

1.- Crude Oil:                    6.500 quads Btu
2.- Natural Gas:                5.200 quads Btu
3.- Coal:                          20.500 quads Btu

For a total of 32.200 quadrillions Btu.

It may be rightly argued that, since we are going to extend the forecasts over the next century, several factors of uncertainties should be considered and constantly kept in mind: firstly, exploration technologies, also in connection with the evolution of market prices and the different geopolitical situations, might assume an extremely relevant role. Secondly. The question of technology improvement for both energy production and energy end uses becomes even more important. Alongside with these two factors we must not underestimate the importance of the transport and distribution of the energy, especially for its high value from the social point of view, besides its effect on the energy balance of the whole energy system. Last but not least we must face several problems in connection with energy supply and use, to and in the developing world, which arise if environmental constraints are to be considered as key factors of any energy system.

So, if the current trends will continue over the next century, then the total annual energy consumption could be expected to reach a value about 1.500 quads Btu by the end of the next century, a figure which is about four times the present total energy consumption of the world. Hence, the integrated energy consumption over the next hundred years could be estimated around 90.000 quads Btu, which is almost three times the whole proven fossil fuels reserves.

Let us now come to our Electricity argument. At present, the part of the world’s primary energy consumption, which is deserved to electricity generation is about 38 percent, of which almost 62 percent comes from burning fossil fuels in power plants. The standard forecasting for the year 2020 provides, in relative terms, a very small decrease in oil burning, a stable coal use while natural gas will show up a significant increase as a fuel in power plants. Globally, the burning of of fossil fuels to produce electricity shows a tendency to increase rather than to decrease. In fact, the use of renewable sources to generate electricity appears to decrease by a little amount while nuclear energy power plants are in net decline.

The Chinese “Three Gorges Dam” project, the completion of which is scheduled for the year 2009, would, through its 26 generators, operate at an installed capacity of more than 18 Gigawatts, which in turn is equivalent to more than 30 Gigawatts coal-fired power plants. The effective production of electricity of this world’s largest hydroelectric plant would be around 100 Billion Kilowatthours per year. We mention this recent and major project not only for its high relevance on scenarios other than that of electricity, but also to show its relatively small impact on the whole energy scenario.

To be more quantitative in the argumentation we return back to the total energy consumption as it is known for the year 1995.
Out of the 375 quads Btu, 38 percent are used to produce electricity, and the 62 percent of these comes from fossil fuels. All that means that 88 quads Btu are used every year in fossil fuels power plants to generate electricity. Moreover, we know that, at present, one third of the total net electricity generation comes out from hydro, nuclear and renewable sources. Projections over the first quarter of the next century, while showing a near doubling of the need of electricity, show also a decrease of the share of these last mentioned sources to one fourth of the total net electricity generation. The world’s need of electricity will rely more and more on fossil fuels unless a breakthrough in fusion technology and/or new adjustments and regulations can permit the recourse to nuclear fission energy in safe and acceptable methodologies.   So, if we assume very simply a factor of five in electricity demand by near the end of the next century, then it is easy to estimate the integrated consumption of fossil fuels used for electricity generation. This turns out to be a figure in between 25.000 and 28.000 quads Btu. Almost 80 percent of the whole proven reserves of fossil fuels.

One due remark is the following: a factor of 5 in electricity demand, combined with doubling of the world’s population will signify not more than 5000 kWh of electricity consumption per capita per year, by the end of the next century. This figure is still far from the present per capita consumption of electricity in the industrialized countries. China, India and Africa will certainly have the most relevant role characterizing this over all scenario.

A. A. Makarov. In his authoritative paper on “New Trends and Integration Effects in the World Power Development”, presents a variety of important arguments which add challenge to challenge.   How the energy policy makers can afford all these challenging problems, without leaving aside the very pressing issues of environmental effects connected to production, distribution and consumption of energy? Since everything comes back to energy, our global environmental strategies, local and regional air pollution, the notion of moving toward a more healthy and wealthy society, the legitimate rights of many countries to development, the notion of sustainable development, the worrisome problem of climate change and many other minor problems; all these represent severe constraints and boundary conditions that should be fulfilled, at least partially, by any proposal. The Kyoto protocol represents the full awareness of the International Community that only joint plans for the solution of the energy problems may aspire to any sort of success.

May 25th 2005

The attached document on electrification issues from Ken Davis (one time Deputy Secretary of Energy in ERDA) may be of interest

February 21st

Hisham Khatib sends an article by Malcomb Keay on " CO2 Emissions Reduction: Time for a Reality Check? "

February  16th
Please note and comment on the proposed 2005 schedule.   I have also put on the site a news release  by the DESI group in India about their small electricity  generators.

 December 16th 2004 The Chairman sends his holiday greeting and suggests a schedule for next year's meeting

November 11th 2004

At 11 am today we mourn the fact that the "war to end all wars" had come to an end but did not end all wars.

Hisham Khatib sends his report on the World Energy Council conference in Sydney
Ashok Khosla's comment seconded by Bill Fulkerson
Thank you for the excellent summary of the WEC Congress in Sydney.  It seems to have covered the spectrum of energy issues pretty well.  I particularly appreciated its emphasis on the need for an inclusive approach, making a case both for using the full range of energy options possible and for satisfying the different needs of the full diversity of users.  Innovation is certainly a critical need in this area.
 
I only wish the Congress had given a little more attention to some of the issues often neglected by the energy community, such as:
 
-  The need for more aggresive exploration of options other than the ones that dominate the energy scene today, such as renewables, decentralised energy production and energy efficiency.  Although some of these were mentioned at the Congress, they tend to get the short shrift in real life and I believe they need special emphasis.  What the Congress said on the subject is like saying that no species should be idolized or demonized and that we should give equal importance to saving species of algae as to saving every species of tiger.  A good theoretically correct sentiment but meaningless in actual praxis.
 
-  The importance of full-cost pricing, including not only the costs to the public exchequer of subsidies but also the cost paid by nature for both sourcing the resource and for sinking the wastes after its use.  The massive costs of displacement of human populations, deforestation, soil erosion, oil spills, etc, etc never seem to be taken but very superficially into the calculation of the costs.  Energy people also often forget the huge indirect subsidies they benefit from such as those given for transportation, water and other utilities.  I think the phrase "cost-reflective pricing" is too weak to convey the gravity of these issues
 
-  The distributive aspects of access to energy, a pre-requisite for improving the lives of 3 billion people who live below the $2 per day poverty line, and most of whom have virtually no access to electricity or commercial energy sources, can only be dealt with either by reducing the price of the fuel/energy delivered to the poor, or by increasing their purchasing power.  Personally, I believe this is the number one issue for the energy community and it is not dealt with at all.  As far as I can make out, they seem only to be concerned with how to get more energy to those who are already using too much -- whether for social justice considerations or for planetary survival.  Or for their own good -- becoming addicted to anything sooner or later leads to self-destruction.
 
Dan Kammen adds his recent article on the subject

October 17th 2004
Report of the Energypmp for 2004: 
Written report prepared by coordinator Bruce Stram 
Chairman's power point slides  on August 23rd 

September 7th 2004

Hishab Khatib's review of Edwards-Kerry energy program

August 20th 2004

Reports of the August 19th meeting and other reports of the August 20-24th meeting are located here

Hisham Khatib Energy in the light of global warming.  Presentation on August 20th
Carmen De Figlio The costs of NOT including Nuclear and Carbon Sequestration
Richard Wilson    Sustainable Nuclear Energy -  Some reasons for Optimism
Barkat Electrification of Bangladesh
Kumar Energy for Rural Areas:  the Perspective of India  
Jef Ongena - The future of Fusion

August 13th 2004

Revised plan for Thursday August 19th meeting of PMP (please make suggestions for modification)
 Meet at 9.30 am
Approval of agenda
Discussion of Energy for Developing countries
Talks by:
    9.45    Dr Barkat (Bangladesh) Electrification of Bangladesh
    10.30 Daniel Kammen (UC Berkeley) will not be coming  Renewables in developing countries will not be given
    10.30 Dr Kumar (India) Energy renewables in India
    11.15   Discussion of ways to help these developing countries (see Fulkerson, Levine et al proposal)
___12.00 Discussion of afternoon's agenda on energy generally and in particular resolution(s) for action that Professor Khatib or the Chairman will raise to the whole group and that we hope Zichichi with support and send upwards.

  SEND IN YOUR IDEAS


1 pm   Lunch
____________________*************_____________
4.00 pm   Energy in the context of climate change
4.05 pm   (a)  a long term one.  What is the status of fusion?   Jeff Ongena prooses to bring us up to date.  I suggest we try to keep that short - 20 minutes.
4. 30 pm (b)   raised by David Bodansky (who cannot be there) and others:  we should discuss nuclear fission and its ability to meet global warming concerns.   Traditionally the Nobel Laureates who came to Erice have all been strong nuclear power advocates,  but the antinuclear sentiment in the world has been such that it has been boring to keep raising the same issues year after year.  But I am convinced that there have been enough recent changes that this year we should reconsider the issues.    I have been asked to prepare a paper for a special issue of the "International Journal of Global Energy Issues (IJGEI)" which I am entitling: Sustainable Nuclear Energy - Some Reasons for Optimism.This will cover the same ground as papers I wrote 10 years ago, but with changed emphais because of the change in public perception.   I am in the middle of the draft but have posted a set of power point slides I will present quickly (in 20 minutes or less) at the PMP.

5.00 pm   The US often sets the agenda.  We should discuss the energy programs of the rival Presidential candidates

 5.30 pm  (c)   General discussion of energy issues including resolutions for Zichichi
6 pm   Chairman of PMP for next year
6.15 pm Discussion of next years program.   We have discussed earlier that we should emphasize carbon sequestration and meet jointly with the committee of the World Energy Council at Erice in August for 2 days as our August meeting.    I suggest that if we confirm this that we invite Dr Klaus Lackner (originally a high energy physicist) from Columbia University to join us.   He thinks about the problems in ways of which Nino Zichichi would approve.    I will post here within a week some articles on the subject.

6.45 pm   Anyone else want to say anything?    Please let me know

7 pm  Any Other Business
before 7.30  adjourn

On August 20th or 21st Dr Hisham Khatib will present his paper: to the main group. 

August 13th 2004

Senator Kerry and Mr Edwards have released a summary of their energy proposal. It is attached here.   I note that it subsidizes renewables, and coal (new combined cycle plants which cost a lot more) but no mention of sequestration.  It also continues and expands the ethanol from corn program which is actually energy inefficient when the whole fuel chain is considered (and is widely perceived as a subsidy for the company Archer, Daniels, Midland ).    I suggest that we look at this on the afternoon of August 19th at the PMP meeting, and suggest some resolutions for the whole group of WFS.    Although the US is only one country, it remains the world's largest fuel user.     Hisham Khatib's comments upon another version.

August 3rd

Bill Fulkerson sends an update of his and Levine's  proposal for international aid to developing countries with emphasis on energy efficiency.

July 30th 2004

Comment by Joseph Chahoud

Dear Chairman,

I’m here getting back to you only now since until a few days ago I was so busy preparing, finishing and submitting to the editor a paper on “Public Transport Policy and Measures that could improve the air quality in major cities in the Mediterranean basin”. Hence I sat scanning, in chronological order, the mass of correspondence started last winter and early spring within many of the members of the PMP Energy group. Navigation in such a bedlam has revealed itself to be not an easy task, and I had a feeling of bewilderment. But, not exactly all of sudden, I realized that we have, this year, to face two major issues; namely global warming and climate change, and energy for developing countries. This latter was our priority option that was put forward 2 years ago by P.K. Iyengar and others.
As for what concerns global warming and climate change I would say that the problem, which is per se very complex in its intrinsic nonlinearity, is still questionable and under debate within the scientific community (see e.g. Nature, v 429 n 6992, just to mention one of the most recent articles on the subject). Much have been said during the plenary sessions last year, and I wonder if we could put forward any further contribution, except from our own competency calling for a reduction of GHG emissions in the processes of energy production and consumption. So I think it would fair enough if we address proposals in that direction, proposals that should be linked to the second issue which is “energy for developing countries”.
This important issue, although not having been well defined or understood at full, is certainly strictly linked to another one which has a high ethical quality, namely that of “Poverty”. Two billions of fellow citizens live on less than 2 $ a day and survive burning dung or wood for fuel. 80% of them still have no access to electricity. What is needed is an energy system based on renewable energy and improving efficiency; to say it with Klaus Toepfer, a combination commonly called “sustainable energy”, a multi-purpose tool that can best help all countries in their sustainable development. Put another way: development needs energy, sustainable development needs sustainable energy. A tentative definition of sustainable energy could be given by a few examples: sometimes it means increasing the system efficiency of burning fossil fuels, such as coal, to generate electricity squeezing the most efficiency of both supply and demand, while reducing the emissions of pollutants such as carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide and PMs. Sometimes it means a photovoltaic plant, whether small or large. Sometimes it means a dam that can provide water and electricity while protecting the river habitat. Sometimes it means a wind farm feeding electricity into a national grid or into a mini grid.
Amazingly enough we find that the distribution of the population over the globe is mostly concentrated in areas where there is scarcity of “concentrated” primary energy resources; the few have a lot and the many have a little (exceptions do exist and are well known). In my view the soft distribution of the population over the rural areas requires the exploitation of the so